Home › Expeditions › Safari planner index

The Safari Planner Index 2026: Thirteen Specialists Scored

13 planners scored on five published criteriaVerified 10 September 2026By Richard J.Rankings unpaid · partners labelled

Yellow Zebra Safaris is the best-scoring luxury safari planner of 2026 at 90 out of 100 on planning depth, on-the-ground cover, pricing transparency, review evidence and financial protection; Go2Africa scores 84, Micato 77, Natural World Safaris 70 and Extraordinary Journeys 68. Only five of the thirteen publish a price before you enquire, and five state no financial protection scheme of any kind on their own website. These are the companies that book the camps rather than own them — a different job from the lodge groups on the luxury safari operator index, judged on different things. The index says who covers what and what decides each score; the criteria, the breakdown and the two companies deliberately left unscored follow.

Thirteen planners · five published criteria · 10 September 2026

90/100 · Yellow Zebra

#	Planner · base	Coverage	What decides it	Score
1	Yellow Zebra SafarisLondon	14 countries, East and Southern Africa plus the Congo and the Indian Ocean	The only planner here that publishes from-price ranges AND is explicitly ATOL bonded: £4,983–£8,726 pp for Botswana’s best-known parks, a 24/7 WhatsApp concierge and a Chief Medical Officer	90
2	Go2AfricaCape Town	15 African countries plus Seychelles, Mauritius, Zanzibar and Madagascar	The deepest verified review record of any operator this site has scored, 98/100, plus a genuine in-country head office and 24/7 support — but prices load only on enquiry	84
3	Micato SafarisNew York	Eight African countries plus India	Publishes a price against every itinerary — the Micato Grand Safari at $40,150 pp for 15 days — and a 24-hour concierge team, but states no financial protection scheme at all	77
4	Natural World SafarisSussex	18 African countries within 40-plus destinations reaching the poles and Asia	From-prices on the trip pages (from $10,500 pp in Kenya, $13,000 for Rwanda gorillas), ATOL and Trust My Travel protection stated, but no 24/7 line	70
5	Extraordinary JourneysNew York and Nairobi	16 African countries	Sample itineraries priced openly at $12,000–$16,000 pp and a strong review record at 83/100, undercut by published hours of 9.30–17.30 EST Monday to Friday and no stated protection	68
6	Audley TravelOxfordshire	All seven continents; Africa is one region among ten	“We’re there 24/7” stated plainly, IATA, AITO and B Corp credentials, and example trip costs of £3,610–£13,595 — but no set prices, and neither ATOL nor ABTA appears	66
7	ROAR AFRICAMiami Beach	12 African countries	Prices everything, including $187,500 pp for its 2027 signature trip, and answers a 24-hour line — but has almost no public review record, scoring 25/100 on review evidence, and states no protection	65
8	Aardvark SafarisHampshire	19 countries across Africa and the Indian Ocean	The widest African country list of any planner scored here, ATOL cover and a 100% financial protection guarantee — and not a single published price or 24/7 line	59
9	Original TravelLondon	Global, nine regions including Antarctica	The only planner here holding all three of ABTA, ATOL and IATA. Publishes no prices, and offers a concierge and an emergency helpline rather than stated 24/7 cover	58
10	Cazenove+LoydLondon	Over 80 countries across nine regions	“Travel questions? Call us 24/7” with UK and US numbers, and ATOL cover — against no published pricing of any kind and Africa as one region of nine	57
11	Journeys by DesignBrighton	Eight countries, including Chad, Gabon and the Congo Basin	Plans the hardest countries on this page — Chad, Gabon, the Congo Basin, the Omo Valley — but publishes no prices, states no 24/7 cover, and carries an ATOL logo with no accompanying detail	53
12	Red SavannahCheltenham	Ten regions worldwide	Holds a King’s Award for Enterprise granted May 2025 for five years, and states no ATOL, ABTA or IATA protection, no prices and no 24/7 cover	45
13	Jacada TravelLondon	Ten regions worldwide	Ten regions and a concierge promise, with no published price, no stated support hours and no financial-protection credential found on the site at all	44

Company names link to the operators, which pay nothing and had no input into their scores. Go2Africa is an affiliate of this site — its affiliate links below are labelled, its score was computed on the same five criteria as everyone else’s from figures anyone can check, and the relationship earned it no points. Safari.com and BookAllSafaris links are affiliate links. No partner placement is live on this page.

On this page

Planner or operator: which you are buying
How the five criteria work
Who publishes a price
Who protects your deposit
The full breakdown
Named but not scored
Questions readers ask

Planner or operator: which one you are actually buying

An operator owns the camps. A planner books them. Singita, Wilderness, andBeyond, Great Plains, Asilia and Time + Tide own and run lodges and are scored on the operator index on property quality, conservation substance and concession access. Not one company on this page owns anything on the ground.

What a planner sells is judgement, logistics and risk-carrying: which camp in which month, how the light aircraft connect, and who answers when a strip is flooded. The camp rate is broadly the same whichever route you take — that arithmetic is on specialist versus booking direct, where the specialist route scores 90 against 77 for a platform and 59 for booking direct. So a planner is not a mark-up on the lodge. It is a service you are buying separately, and it should be judged separately, which is what this page does.

A lioness standing beside an open safari vehicle on the grassland of the Maasai Mara, Kenya. — Lioness beside a safari vehicle, Maasai Mara, Kenya. Every planner on this index sells the Mara; none of the photographs on this page were taken on a trip with any of them. Photograph: Sanjeed Quazi, Pexels.

How the five criteria work

Weighted to 100: planning depth 25 · on-the-ground cover 20 · pricing transparency 20 · review evidence 20 · financial protection 15. Everything is scored from what the company publishes on its own site or what an independent platform shows — never from a brochure claim restated as fact.

Weighted to 100 and deliberately close to the Power Rankings rubric so scores stay comparable across the cluster. Two divergences, stated: the Power Rankings’ brand authority weight of 15 becomes financial protection here, because a planner holds your money for a year before you travel and fame does not protect it; and its single operational-quality weight of 30 is split into planning depth 25 and on-the-ground cover 20, because a planner can be excellent at one and absent at the other.
Criterion	Weight	What scores
Planning depth	25	African countries covered, and how specific the published itineraries are — named camps and routes rather than a ‘bespoke’ page with no content. Depth in hard countries counts for more than breadth across easy ones.
On-the-ground cover	20	Stated support hours and in-country presence. A 24/7 line that the site states scores; ‘our experts’ does not. A head office inside Africa scores above a representative office.
Pricing transparency	20	What the operator publishes before you enquire: from-price ranges, priced sample itineraries, or nothing. This is the criterion carried across every index on this site, so scores are comparable.
Review evidence	20	Carried from this site’s review evidence index, which scores verified sample depth, recency, corroboration and listing integrity. An operator not on that index scores 8 rather than 0.
Financial protection	15	ATOL, ABTA, AITO, IATA or a stated bonding arrangement, read on the operator’s own site. A logo with no accompanying detail scores below a stated scheme.

Two divergences from the rubric used on the luxury tour operator power rankings, stated so the scores stay readable against each other. Brand authority, worth 15 there, is replaced here by financial protection: a planner holds a five-figure deposit for the better part of a year, and reputation is not a bonding scheme. And the single operational-quality weight of 30 is split into planning depth and on-the-ground cover, because several companies on this page are genuinely strong at one and absent at the other — a distinction a combined score hides.

Who publishes a price, and who makes you ask

Five of thirteen publish something useful before an enquiry: Micato prices every itinerary outright, ROAR AFRICA prices all of its signature journeys, Yellow Zebra shows from-price ranges, Natural World Safaris carries from-prices on trip pages, and Extraordinary Journeys prices sample itineraries. Audley states plainly that it carries no set prices and gives example costs instead. Six publish nothing at all.

The numbers actually on the page are worth quoting, because they set the shape of the market: Micato’s fifteen-day Grand Safari at $40,150 per person and its ten-day Tanzania Spectacular at $20,700; ROAR AFRICA’s 2027 signature trip at $187,500 per person sharing; Yellow Zebra’s Botswana circuit at £4,983–£8,726; Natural World’s Rwanda gorilla safari from $13,000 and its Kenya photographic safari from $10,500; Extraordinary Journeys at $12,000 for ten days in Kenya and $16,000 for fourteen in Egypt; and Audley’s stated example range of £3,610–£13,595. Against those, a page that says only “bespoke” is asking you to spend a phone call to learn whether you are in the right shop. That is the gap this criterion measures, and it is the cheapest one on the page for a company to fix. What a safari costs by budget band, independent of operator, is on the safari cost page. To price the same camps directly while you decide, BookAllSafaris and Safari.com (affiliate links) both carry live inventory.

Elephants crossing open grassland in Amboseli, Kenya, with dry scrub and hills behind. — Amboseli, Kenya. Eight of the thirteen planners scored here sell Kenya; what separates them is what they publish before you call. Photograph via Pexels.

Who protects your deposit

Original Travel states ABTA, ATOL and IATA together, the most complete stack found. Yellow Zebra states it is fully accredited and bonded under ATOL. Aardvark states ATOL plus a 100 per cent guarantee, and Natural World states ATOL and Trust My Travel. Micato, Extraordinary Journeys, ROAR AFRICA, Red Savannah and Jacada state no scheme at all on their own sites.

This is fifteen points because of what a safari booking actually is: a deposit paid nine to twelve months out, on a trip whose suppliers are small businesses on another continent. The deposit and payment terms guide covers what a six-figure deposit needs, and how to verify a safari operator before you pay covers the checks. Two clarifications on the scoring. Absence of a stated scheme is not proof that none exists — a company may be bonded and simply not say so, and several here plainly are — but a buyer cannot verify what is not published, so it scores where it scores and any company can have the row recomputed by pointing at the page that states it. And an ATOL logo with no accompanying text scores below a stated scheme, which is why Journeys by Design takes 8 of 15 rather than 12.

The full breakdown

Every score below is the sum of five published components, and the case against each company sits in the same row as the case for. Nothing here was scored on request and no company had input into its position.

Planning depth: African countries covered and how specific the published itineraries are. On-the-ground cover: stated support hours and in-country presence, not implied capability. Pricing transparency: what the operator publishes without an enquiry. Review evidence: carried from this site’s review evidence index where the operator is scored there; an operator absent from it scores 8 of 20 rather than nothing, because absence from one index is not evidence of poor service. Financial protection: schemes and memberships stated on the operator’s own site. Read 10 September 2026; re-scored quarterly.
Planner	Planning depth /25	On-the-ground cover /20	Pricing transparency /20	Review evidence /20	Financial protection /15	Total
Yellow Zebra Safaris	22	19	18	18	13	90
Go2Africa	23	20	9	20	12	84
Micato Safaris	20	15	19	18	5	77
Natural World Safaris	21	11	17	8	13	70
Extraordinary Journeys	22	8	17	17	4	68
Audley Travel	17	18	13	8	10	66
ROAR AFRICA	20	17	19	5	4	65
Aardvark Safaris	22	11	6	8	12	59
Original Travel	16	13	6	8	15	58
Cazenove+Loyd	16	18	6	8	9	57
Journeys by Design	21	10	6	8	8	53
Red Savannah	16	11	6	8	4	45
Jacada Travel	16	10	6	8	4	44

Re-scored quarterly. A company can move on any criterion by publishing something it currently does not: a from-price, its support hours, its protection scheme. Three of the five criteria are documentation rather than capability, which is deliberate — the parts of a planner a buyer can check before paying are the parts that should decide a public index. Corroborating evidence for the review-evidence column is on the review evidence index and dated credentials are on the award and credentials index.

Named but not scored

Ker & Downey Africa — the company has changed

kerdowneyafrica.com now redirects to Ker & Downey Botswana, a Maun-based business describing over 58 years in the industry, publishing a 2027 rates document and opening its first camp in Zambia at Liuwa Plain. That is an owner-operator, not a pan-African planner, so it is out of scope for this index and belongs on the operator index instead. This is now the fourth distinct Ker & Downey identity this site has had to separate, alongside Ker & Downey Safaris of Nairobi (1946) and the Texas company — the confusion documented on the review evidence index. Anyone comparing quotes from “Ker & Downey” should establish which company they are talking to before comparing anything.

Abercrombie & Kent is named but not scored. Its site returned no readable content when the field was checked on 10 September 2026, so not one of the five criteria could be assessed at source, and this site does not score what it cannot check — the same rule that left Ponant off the expedition cruise index. It is scored at 90 on the power rankings against a generalist rubric, and it will be assessed here on the next quarterly pass or sooner if the site becomes readable. Scott Dunn is scored at 80 on the power rankings and is held for the family and multigenerational index, where its strengths actually sit.

Open Serengeti grassland under a wide sky with scattered acacia trees. — The Serengeti. Twelve of the thirteen planners scored here sell Tanzania; the thirteenth, Journeys by Design, sells Chad and Gabon instead. Photograph via Pexels.

Booking through a planner is one route; the wider comparison of specialists, platforms and going direct is on specialist versus booking direct, the generalist field is on the best luxury travel companies index, and individual assessments of five of the companies above are published: Go2Africa, Yellow Zebra, Micato, Extraordinary Journeys and ROAR AFRICA, with the two leaders set against each other on Go2Africa versus Yellow Zebra. To book with the highest-scoring company that this site can transact with, Go2Africa (affiliate link).

Straight answers to the questions readers ask

Who is the best luxury safari planner in 2026?

Yellow Zebra Safaris, at 90 out of 100 on planning depth, on-the-ground cover, pricing transparency, review evidence and financial protection. It is the only planner scored here that both publishes from-price ranges and states explicit ATOL bonding, and it backs that with a 24/7 WhatsApp concierge and a local network across fourteen countries. Go2Africa scores 84 on the strongest review record of any operator this site has examined, and Micato 77.

What is the difference between a safari planner and a safari operator?

An operator owns the camps; a planner books them. Singita, Wilderness, andBeyond and Great Plains own and run lodges, and are scored on this site's luxury safari operator index on property quality, conservation substance and concession access. Yellow Zebra, Go2Africa, Micato and the rest of this page own nothing on the ground: they design the itinerary, hold your deposit and carry the risk when a flight or a road fails. Those are different jobs and they need different criteria, which is why they are on different pages.

Which safari companies publish their prices?

Five of the thirteen scored here publish something useful before you enquire. Yellow Zebra shows from-price ranges by trip, Micato prices every itinerary outright, ROAR AFRICA prices all of its signature journeys, Natural World Safaris carries from-prices on trip pages, and Extraordinary Journeys prices sample itineraries. Aardvark Safaris, Cazenove+Loyd, Jacada, Journeys by Design, Original Travel and Red Savannah publish nothing, and Audley states directly that it carries no set prices, giving example costs instead.

Which safari planners have financial protection?

Original Travel states the most complete stack, holding ABTA, ATOL and IATA together. Yellow Zebra states it is fully accredited and bonded under ATOL. Aardvark Safaris states ATOL and a 100 per cent financial protection guarantee, and Natural World Safaris states ATOL and Trust My Travel. Audley states IATA, AITO and B Corp but neither ATOL nor ABTA. Micato, Extraordinary Journeys, ROAR AFRICA, Red Savannah and Jacada state no protection scheme on their own sites, which is what the criterion is measuring and where those scores go.

Does an American or a British safari company protect my money better?

British operators can hold ATOL and ABTA, which are statutory and trade schemes with defined pay-outs if the company fails, and most of the London-based planners here state at least ATOL. US-based planners generally rely on seller-of-travel registration and their own guarantees, which vary. It is a real difference on a deposit held for twelve months, and it accounts for the fifteen points on this index. It is not the same as trip quality, and this page scores the two separately.

Is Abercrombie and Kent on this index?

Named but not scored this pass. Its site returned no readable content when the field was checked on 10 September 2026, so none of the five criteria could be assessed from the source, and this site does not score what it cannot check. Abercrombie and Kent is scored at 90 on the luxury tour operator power rankings against a different, generalist rubric. It will be assessed here on the next quarterly pass or sooner if the site becomes readable.

Which planner is best for remote or first-descent Africa?

Journeys by Design, on coverage rather than on total score. It plans Chad, Gabon, the Congo Basin and Ethiopia's Omo Valley, which almost nobody else on this page attempts, and that specialism is worth more to the right traveller than eleven points of total. It scores 53 because it publishes no prices, states no support hours and carries an ATOL logo with no detail beside it — documentation gaps rather than judgements on its planning.

Can a planner pay to be added to this index or move up it?

No. Additions are free and unconditional, entries are scored on the same five published criteria, and the case against each company is printed in the same row as the case for. A partner buys a labelled placement beside the ranking and a programme of pages around it, never a score or a position. Go2Africa is an affiliate of this site and is scored here on figures anyone can check; the commercial relationship earned it no points and is disclosed at the foot of the page.